Subscribe!

Email:
Zip:

The Coolest Way to Stop Global Warming: The Waxman-Markey Climate Bill


Thomas Friedman said of the Waxman-Markey bill:

"It stinks. It's a mess... Now let's get it passed in the Senate and make it law."

The Waxman-Markey bill, H.R. 2454 (also known as the American Clean Energy and Security Act), is not strong enough to comprehensively stop global warming and all its destructive effects. Some organizations and Congressmen have opposed it on precisely these grounds. Others have opposed the bill for doing way too much, too fast. There are many reports available about the consequences that this legislation would have. It should be no surprise that many of these arrive at different conclusions. What we do know, however, is that global warming is occurring now, it is causing much death and destruction, and these harmful effects will magnify in the future. We need to act now.

In order to start the journey, this first step must be taken. The climate bill represents compromises and concessions, many of which had to be made for the bill to pass the House. Most importantly, the climate bill imposes a cost on polluting, thereby changing the incentives that companies face, and, as President Obama said, "making clean energy the profitable kind of energy."

While considering the concessions that did weaken the bill, we should not lose sight of its many beneficial provisions. The Environmental Defense Fund said that the bill's 2020 pollution cuts would be equivalent to taking 50 million cars off the road. There are also many measures that help people cope with price increases associated with the bill.

So, why should the Senate pass this bill if it does not provide a one-stop, full-proof way to halt climate change?

1. It is a symbolic step to demonstrate the U.S.'s commitment to fight climate change

2. It establishes the administrative framework and agencies required to tackle climate change more aggressively in the future

3. It has many beneficial provisions, providing for measures such as forest conservation, wildlife protection, electric vehicle use, and investment in renewable energy. By establishing a cap-and-trade program for greenhouse gases, incentives are created to invest in environmentally friendly technology as businesses strive to cut costs

4. The U.S. should pass domestic climate legislation before the December 2009 conference in Copenhagen, where countries will meet to discuss an international climate agreement that is to succeed the Kyoto Protocol. This is necessary if the U.S. is to have any legitimacy during those talks, and if it is to be in a position to negotiate the issue with other countries.

5. Despite the many reports that provide different estimates of how much going green would would cost, the price of doing nothing is far more worrisome. No method can fully account for all the costs of changing weather patterns, rising sea levels, and health hazards associated with pollution. Air and water pollution are already reducing human life expectancy and causing genetic mutations in humans and animals. You can't put a price on that.

The bill has passed the House, but is still to be on voted in the Senate. As we advocate for speedy passage and strengthening of the bill, here are some provisions to keep in mind-

 

Issue What the Science Says* What the Climate Bill Does
Assessment
POLLUTION EMISSIONS Carbon emissions need to be reduced by 25%-40% compared to 1990 levels by 2020 Reduces emissions by 5%-17% compared to 1990 levels by 2020 The bill needs to be strengthened and followed by subsequent measures to reduce emissions sufficiently
EMISSIONS CAP Global emissions must peak by 2015 to avoid catastrophic temperature increases The emissions cap and offset provisions of the bill provide for emissions to peak around 2020 The bill does aim to gradually reduce net emissions, but 5 years too late
GLOBAL WARMING The global average temperature should not rise more than 2°C above current levels Under current conditions, the global average temperature would rise by around 3°C by 2100. The climate bill would limit this increase to around 2.8°C The bill works towards gradually reducing the rate of global warming, but more needs to be done to reduce the temperature growth rate
CLEAN ELECTRICITY At least 25% of electricity should be produced from renewable energy sources by 2020 States have to generate 20% of electricity from renewable energy and efficiency improvements by 2020
While this is a good provision, there are several exemptions that prevent this clause from applying to all electricity generation

To learn more about the legislation's positive provisions and effects, click here

To see our blogs on climate change, click here

** ACT NOW in support of strengthened environmental policy!

* Resources-
Master Resource
International Climate Change Task Force
International Panel on Climate Change
The Breakthrough Institute
U.S. Climate Action Partnership

EPA Report
EPA analysis

Breakthrough Institute's Analysis
World Resources Institute paper
EPA analysis
Assessment by Mother Jones
Grist article on concessions to Agriculture Committee

 

418 7th Street SE, Washington, DC 20003-2796
Phone: (202) 546-3950 Fax: (202) 546-3749
Privacy Policy